This bibliography includes all formal computational models in Roman studies.

Notice one is missing? You can add it yourself to theĀ open access Zotero bibliography “Roman-simulations” which will automatically feature the newly added publication on this page.

Bibliography Roman Simulations

Brughmans, T., & Poblome, J. (2017). The case for computational modelling of the Roman economy: a reply to Van Oyen. Antiquity, 91(359), 1364–1366.
Brughmans, T., & Poblome, J. (2016). Roman bazaar or market economy? Explaining tableware distributions through computational modelling. Antiquity, 90(350), 393–408.
Brughmans, T., & Poblome, J. (2016). MERCURY: an agent-based model of tableware trade in the Roman East. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 19(1),
Coto-sarmiento, M., Rubio-campillo, X., & Remesal, J. (2018). Identifying social learning between Roman amphorae workshops through morphometric similarity. Journal of Archaeological Science, 96(April), 117–123.
Crabtree, S. (2016). Simulating Littoral Trade: Modeling the Trade of Wine in the Bronze to Iron Age Transition in Southern France. Land, 5(1), 5.
Fousek, J., Výtvarová, E., Mertel, A., Chalupa, A., & Hladká, E. (2016). Agent-Based Modelling And Simulation For The Geospatial Network Model Of The Roman World. In International Symposium on Grids and Clouds (ISGC) 2016.
Fousek, J., Kaše, V., Mertel, A., Výtvarová, E., & Chalupa, A. (2018). Spatial constraints on the diffusion of religious innovations: The case of early Christianity in the Roman Empire. PLOS ONE, 13(12), e0208744. Retrieved from
Graham, S. (2006). Networks, Agent-Based Models and the Antonine Itineraries: Implications for Roman Archaeology. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 19(1), 45–64.
Graham, S., & Weingart, S. (2015). The Equifinality of Archaeological Networks: An Agent Based Exploratory Lab Approach. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22, 248–274.
Groenhuijzen, M. R., & Verhagen, P. (2016). Testing the Robustness of Local Network Metrics in Research on Archeological Local Transport Networks. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 3(6), 1–14.
Groenhuijzen, M. R., & Verhagen, P. (2017). Comparing network construction techniques in the context of local transport networks in the Dutch part of the Roman limes. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 15, 235–251.
Joyce, J., & Verhagen, P. (2016). Simulating the Farm: Computational Modelling of Cattle and Sheep Herd Dynamics for the Analysis of Past Animal Husbandry Practices. LAC 2014 Proceedings, 0(0), 17.
Komoróczy, B., & Vlach, M. (2015). Simulating archeological models: Perspectives in protohistory. In S. Sázelová, M. Novák, & A. Mizerová (Eds.), Forgotten times and spaces: New perspectives in paleoanthropological, paleoetnological and archeological studies. 1st Edition. (pp. 494–506). Brno: nstitute of Archeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences; Masaryk University.
Rubio-Campillo, X., Matías, P. V., & Ble, E. (2015). Centurions in the Roman Legion: Computer Simulation and Complex Systems. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 46(2), 245–263.
Snyder, J. R., Dilaver, O., Stephenson, L. C., Mackie, J. E., & Smith, S. D. (2018). Agent-based modelling and construction – reconstructing antiquity’s largest infrastructure project. Construction Management and Economics, 36(6), 313–327.
Van Oyen, A. (2017). Agents and commodities: a response to Brughmans and Poblome (2016) on modelling the Roman economy. Antiquity, 91(359), 1356–1363.
Verhagen, P., Joyce, J., & Groenhuizen, M. (2016). Modelling the Dynamics of Demography in the Dutch Roman Limes Zone. LAC 2014 Proceedings, 0(0), 13.
Verhagen, P., Joyce, J., & Groenhuijzen, M. R. (2019). Finding the Limits of the Limes: modelling demography, economy and transport on the edge of the Roman Empire. Springer.